Loic Cloes vs Madhwin Kamath Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cloes vs Kamath analysis and find out who is favored!
Loic Cloes vs Madhwin Kamath Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cloes has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kamath has won 50.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cloes, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kamath has won 48.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cloes has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kamath has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cloes has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kamath winning 62.5% (W/L 25/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cloes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 37/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 27/ 29). Kamath has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cloes winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cloes winning 2 and Kamath winning 0. The last match between Cloes and Kamath was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 20-02-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Loic Cloes getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cloes and Kamath have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cloes winning 0 times and Kamath 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cloes winning 0, and Kamath 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cloes has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kamath has played against players with an average rank of 56.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cloes has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kamath has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cloes has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kamath has converted 41.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cloes 1 - 0 Kamath
Loic Cloes
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
Madhwin Kamath
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (65-50)
Career Total W/L
59% (63-43)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Loic Cloes | Madhwin Kamath |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Loic Cloes | Madhwin Kamath |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (30/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (243/208) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.15 |
Aces Total | 0 | 32 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 93.7 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (416/704) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (273/416) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (140/288) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (23/54) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (249/645) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Loic Cloes Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Billy Blaydes
Player
Loic Cloes
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
8
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yeongseok Jeong
Player
Loic Cloes
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Loic Cloes
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Loic Cloes
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
6
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Attila Boros
Player
Loic Cloes
57%
(
55 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
128)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
14
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
53 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
128)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Loic Cloes
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Loic Cloes
Player
Loann Massard
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maxime Chazal
Player
Loic Cloes
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
10
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Loic Cloes
Player
Tim Handel
52%
(
69 of
132)
1st Serve %
54%
(
64 of
118)
7
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
11
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
41%
(
26 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
53 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
128
Total Points Won
122
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H |
view more
Madhwin Kamath Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Madhwin Kamath
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Madhwin Kamath
Player
Yunseok Jang
36%
(
8 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
26
Total Points Won
18
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Bingyu Yu
Player
Madhwin Kamath
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
Player
Madhwin Kamath
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-4 | H2H |
view more