Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liv Hovde vs Talia Gibson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hovde vs Gibson analysis and find out who is favored!
Liv Hovde vs Talia Gibson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hovde has won 48.57% of points on his second serve, while Gibson has won 45.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hovde, in recent form, has won 56.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gibson has won 56.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.18% and 37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hovde has saved 54.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibson has saved 61.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hovde has won 60.34% of matches played (W/L 35/ 23), with Gibson winning 61.54% (W/L 48/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hovde has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gibson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 93/ 50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Hovde has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Gibson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hovde has played against opponents with an average rank of 273 while Gibson has played against players with an average rank of 265.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hovde has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibson has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hovde has converted 53.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibson has converted 44.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hovde 0 - 0 Gibson
261
Rank
261
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
188
Rank
184
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
62% (63-38)
Career Total W/L
63% (105-63)
69% (20-9)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$41,630
Career Prize Money
$75,300
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liv Hovde | Talia Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (20/9) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (44/26) | 52% (29/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (354/297) | 51% (264/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 33% (3/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (8/3) | 64% (9/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.06 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 121 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:2 | 1:45:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 275.45 | 205.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1391/2158) | 65% (1117/1727) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (811/1391) | 67% (744/1117) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (371/767) | 44% (268/610) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (152/282) | 42% (82/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1031/2138) | 43% (723/1693) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (17/7) | 53% (10/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (20/29) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (16/15) | 71% (14/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (16/1) | 29% (14/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 22% (9/2) |
Liv Hovde Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Maya Joint
Player
Liv Hovde
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
54 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Liv Hovde
80%
(
88 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
86 of
129)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
67 of
129)
124
Total Points Won
115
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Akasha Urhobo
80%
(
84 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
53%
(
56 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Katrina Scott
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Ashton Bowers
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Alana Smith
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesya Tsurenko
Player
Liv Hovde
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
21 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Harriet Dart
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Talia Gibson
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Talia Gibson
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
6
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
51 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Talia Gibson
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mia Hasegawa
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Talia Gibson
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Timea Babos
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Jessika Ponchet
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Valeria Savinykh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hovde Vs Gibson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
