Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Linda Noskova vs Nadia Podoroska Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Noskova vs Podoroska analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Linda Noskova vs Nadia Podoroska Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Noskova 0 - 0 Podoroska
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noskova has won 46.97% of points on their second serve, while Podoroska has won 41.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noskova, in recent form, has won 51.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Podoroska has won 56.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.87% and 37.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noskova has saved 58.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Podoroska has saved 50.99% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noskova has won 63.46% of matches played (W/L 33/ 19), with Podoroska winning 53.23% (W/L 33/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Podoroska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 254/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9), where as Podoroska has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noskova has played against opponents with an average rank of 104.83 while Podoroska has played against players with an average rank of 159.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noskova has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Podoroska has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noskova has converted 43.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Podoroska has converted 43.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
26
Rank
26
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
65
Rank
36
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
67% (138-68)
Career Total W/L
62% (386-232)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
48% (16-17)
$1,689,608
Career Prize Money
$1,582,396
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Linda Noskova vs Nadia Podoroska For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Noskova VS Podoroska
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Linda Noskova | Nadia Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 48% (16/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (43/31) | 48% (36/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (363/357) | 49% (335/349) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 46% (6/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 59% (10/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 145 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 124 | 106 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:28 | 1:38:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 94.19 | 162 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1437/2327) | 67% (1396/2094) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (988/1437) | 62% (865/1396) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (418/890) | 41% (289/698) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (94/218) | 43% (118/273) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (936/2330) | 45% (997/2230) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (9/5) | 18% (2/9) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 89% (8/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 48% (16/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 91% (10/11) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 21% (19/4) |
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Linda Noskova
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Taylor Townsend
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Angelique Kerber
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
54 of
77)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Noskova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Harriet Dart
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Linda Noskova
42%
(
30 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadia Podoroska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Nadia Podoroska
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
52%
(
45 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Beatrice Ricci
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Louisa Chirico
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Cristina Dinu
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Azarenka
Player
Nadia Podoroska
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nadia Podoroska
85%
(
81 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
44 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Tatjana Maria
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nadia Podoroska
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Nadia Podoroska
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Noskova Vs Podoroska Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Noskova are available here and Podoroska photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Linda Noskova
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nadia Podoroska
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
