Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Liam Draxl vs Ben Shelton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draxl vs Shelton analysis and find out who is favored!
Liam Draxl vs Ben Shelton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Draxl 1 - 1 Shelton
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draxl has won 48.72% of points on his second serve, while Shelton has won 54.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draxl, in recent form, has won 51.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shelton has won 45.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.56% and 27.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draxl has saved 60.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shelton has saved 70.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draxl has won 72.58% of matches played (W/L 45/ 17), with Shelton winning 61.4% (W/L 35/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draxl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 67/ 35), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 34/ 24). Shelton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 33/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Draxl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 7), where as Shelton has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 16/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Draxl winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Draxl winning 2 and Shelton winning 3. The last match between Draxl and Shelton was at the Rome Challenger, 11-07-2022, Q3, I.hard with Ben Shelton getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draxl and Shelton have played a deciding set 1 times, with Draxl winning 1 times and Shelton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Draxl winning 0, and Shelton 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draxl has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.44 while Shelton has played against players with an average rank of 125.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draxl has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shelton has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draxl has converted 40.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shelton has converted 33.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Draxl 1 - 1 Shelton
263
Rank
257
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
14
Rank
14
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
63% (123-73)
Career Total W/L
66% (103-53)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
65% (17-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,920,095
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Liam Draxl | Ben Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 23 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:12 | 2:1:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (99/155) | 65% (88/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (62/99) | 69% (61/88) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (30/56) | 53% (25/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (49/135) | 41% (63/155) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Ben Shelton
Player
Liam Draxl
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Ben Shelton
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Liam Draxl | Ben Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 65% (17/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (22/21) | 59% (41/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (213/208) | 52% (375/345) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 75% (6/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 211 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:58 | 2:10:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.76 | 119.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (844/1273) | 67% (1479/2208) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (571/844) | 75% (1112/1479) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (209/429) | 55% (400/729) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (52/127) | 33% (57/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (523/1323) | 34% (777/2264) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (10/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | 65% (15/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 59% (10/17) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 46% (13/6) |
Liam Draxl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Liam Draxl
71%
(
76 of
107)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
7
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
88%
(
50 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
27 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Liam Draxl
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
72%
(
76 of
106)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
74 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Liam Draxl
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
78 of
107)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Blaise Bicknell
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
71 of
97)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Ben Shelton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Zhizhen Zhang
Player
Ben Shelton
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Pavel Kotov
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
76%
(
25 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
18 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Ben Shelton
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
8
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
31 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Tomas Machac
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Frances Tiafoe
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
11
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
19 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Zizou Bergs
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Ben Shelton
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Martin Landaluce
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Draxl Vs Shelton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ben Shelton
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
