Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lexie Stevens vs Ida Jarlskog Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stevens vs Jarlskog analysis and find out who is favored!
Lexie Stevens vs Ida Jarlskog Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stevens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jarlskog has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stevens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jarlskog has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stevens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jarlskog has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stevens has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 10/ 14), with Jarlskog winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stevens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Jarlskog has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 45/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Stevens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13), where as Jarlskog has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stevens winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Stevens winning 1 and Jarlskog winning 2. The last match between Stevens and Jarlskog was at the Den Haag, 07-07-2018, Semifinals, Clay with Ida Jarlskog getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stevens and Jarlskog have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stevens winning 0 times and Jarlskog 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stevens winning 0, and Jarlskog 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stevens has played against opponents with an average rank of 317.75 while Jarlskog has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stevens has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jarlskog has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stevens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jarlskog has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stevens 0 - 1 Jarlskog
665
Rank
409
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
729
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (145-114)
Career Total W/L
61% (68-44)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lexie Stevens | Ida Jarlskog |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (44/69) | 63% (52/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 43% (19/44) | 52% (27/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (8/25) | 61% (19/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 42% (8/19) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (37/83) | 61% (42/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Lexie Stevens
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lexie Stevens | Ida Jarlskog |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lexie Stevens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Lexie Stevens
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Magdalena Stoilkovska
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Lexie Stevens
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
79%
(
78 of
99)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Anja Wildgruber
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
52%
(
31 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lexie Stevens
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
34 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Amelie Van Impe
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Lexie Stevens
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Emily Welker
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Lexie Stevens
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
82%
(
82 of
100)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexie Stevens
Player
Gloria Ceschi
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Ida Jarlskog Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Melis Yasar
Player
Ida Jarlskog
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Ida Jarlskog
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Sofia Nami Samavati
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
11 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Aminata Sall
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
8 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
41
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Ida Jarlskog
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stevens Vs Jarlskog Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
