Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kenny De Schepper vs Ernests Gulbis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schepper vs Gulbis analysis and find out who is favored!
Kenny De Schepper vs Ernests Gulbis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schepper has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gulbis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schepper, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gulbis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schepper has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gulbis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schepper has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gulbis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schepper has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gulbis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schepper has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gulbis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schepper has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gulbis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schepper 0 - 0 Gulbis
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Kenny De Schepper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Pedro Andre De Almeida Santos
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-0 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Kenny de Schepper
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Luc Fomba
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
33 of
39)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
15 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Matthew Hulme
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
12 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Weber
Player
Kenny de Schepper
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Kenny de Schepper
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Kenny de Schepper
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Altug Celikbilek
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Robin Bertrand
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ernests Gulbis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Cukierman
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Ernests Gulbis
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
7
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Ernests Gulbis
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
47%
(
15 of
32)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Lukas Klein
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Charles Broom
48%
(
48 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
4
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Ernests Gulbis
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Christian Harrison
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
26
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Ernests Gulbis
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Ernests Gulbis
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Schepper Vs Gulbis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
