Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Karlo Cubelic vs Javier Barranco Cosano Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cubelic vs Cosano analysis and find out who is favored!
Karlo Cubelic vs Javier Barranco Cosano Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cubelic has won 47.22% of points on his second serve, while Cosano has won 54.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cubelic, in recent form, has won 48.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cosano has won 54.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30% and 37.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cubelic has saved 47.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cosano has saved 62.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cubelic has won 57.45% of matches played (W/L 27/ 20), with Cosano winning 65.38% (W/L 51/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cubelic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 60/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11). Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 295/ 176), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Cubelic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.7% of matches (W/L 27/ 19), where as Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cubelic winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cubelic winning 0 and Cosano winning 2. The last match between Cubelic and Cosano was at the M15 Kamen, 27-06-2019, Second, Clay with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cubelic and Cosano have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cubelic winning 0 times and Cosano 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cubelic winning 0, and Cosano 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cubelic has played against opponents with an average rank of 41.91 while Cosano has played against players with an average rank of 325.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cubelic has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cosano has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cubelic has converted 44.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cosano has converted 46.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cubelic 0 - 1 Cosano
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
263
Rank
247
High
25
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
53% (161-140)
Career Total W/L
62% (327-204)
62% (8-5)
YTD W/L
66% (21-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$32,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Karlo Cubelic | Javier Barranco Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 44% (26/59) | 70% (26/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (18/26) | 85% (22/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 24% (8/33) | 73% (8/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 19% (7/37) | 56% (33/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Karlo Cubelic
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Karlo Cubelic | Javier Barranco Cosano |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (8/5) | 66% (21/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 62% (48/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (150/108) | 55% (388/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 68% (15/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 69 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 77 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 345.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (190/282) | 63% (1370/2189) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (139/190) | 63% (867/1370) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (39/92) | 56% (460/819) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (10/19) | 45% (121/267) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (104/291) | 44% (982/2250) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/10) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (8/5) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (8/13) | 67% (20/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 46% (6/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 78% (23/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 22% (23/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Karlo Cubelic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Karlo Cubelic
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karlo Cubelic
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Karlo Cubelic
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(0) 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
113)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
113)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(2) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Martin Krumich
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Gastao Elias
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Mathys Erhard
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cubelic Vs Cosano Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Javier Barranco Cosano
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
