Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kalman L. Boyd vs Naoki Tajima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Boyd vs Tajima analysis and find out who is favored!
Kalman L. Boyd vs Naoki Tajima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Boyd has won 49.64% of points on his second serve, while Tajima has won 48.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Boyd, in recent form, has won 51.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has won 49.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.75% and 38.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Boyd has saved 55.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tajima has saved 58.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Boyd has won 67.24% of matches played (W/L 39/ 19), with Tajima winning 54.55% (W/L 30/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Boyd has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 85/ 59), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5). Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Boyd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.24% of matches (W/L 39/ 19), where as Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.86% of matches (W/L 29/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Boyd winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Boyd winning 0 and Tajima winning 2. The last match between Boyd and Tajima was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 10-10-2019, Second, Hard with Naoki Tajima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Boyd and Tajima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Boyd winning 0 times and Tajima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Boyd winning 0, and Tajima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Boyd has played against opponents with an average rank of 86.64 while Tajima has played against players with an average rank of 98.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Boyd has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tajima has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Boyd has converted 40.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tajima has converted 50.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Boyd 0 - 1 Tajima
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
59% (92-64)
Career Total W/L
48% (117-126)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
54% (13-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kalman L. Boyd | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) | 37% (19/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (22/28) | 95% (18/19) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (6/19) | 61% (20/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (14/52) | 40% (19/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Naoki Tajima
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
37%
(
19 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
95%
(
18 of
19)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kalman L. Boyd | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (13/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (33/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (289/241) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 67 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 85.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (703/1207) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (494/703) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (237/504) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (70/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (561/1271) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (15/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (15/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Kalman L. Boyd Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Kirill Kolganov
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Leo Matthysen
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kobelt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
58%
(
67 of
116)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
10
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
7
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
41%
(
20 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
45 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Cayetano March
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
68 of
88)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalman L. Boyd
Player
Egor Agafonov
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Fedor Sosedkin
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Makoto Ochi
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Boyd Vs Tajima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Naoki Tajima
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
