Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Quevedo vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Kaitlin Quevedo vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Quevedo 1 - 0 Hennemann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quevedo has won 50.7% of points on their second serve, while Hennemann has won 46.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quevedo, in recent form, has won 60.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 59.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.19% and 50.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quevedo has saved 57.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 53.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quevedo has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 22/ 12), with Hennemann winning 67.95% (W/L 53/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quevedo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 22/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 27/ 17). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 126/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Quevedo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 94.12% of matches (W/L 16/ 1), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Quevedo winning 1 times and Hennemann being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Quevedo winning 2 and Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Quevedo and Hennemann was at the W15 Sabadell, 24-03-2024, Final, Clay with Kaitlin Quevedo getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Quevedo and Hennemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Quevedo winning 0 times and Hennemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Quevedo winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quevedo has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.09 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 284.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quevedo has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quevedo has converted 52.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 54.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
731
Rank
523
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
394
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
68% (49-23)
Career Total W/L
63% (167-98)
69% (20-9)
YTD W/L
79% (33-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kaitlin Quevedo vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Quevedo VS Hennemann
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Kaitlin Quevedo | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:0 | 1:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (27/52) | 62% (26/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (20/27) | 38% (10/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 31% (5/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 64% (27/42) | 38% (20/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kaitlin Quevedo | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (20/9) | 79% (33/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (44/22) | 78% (70/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (350/244) | 61% (500/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 81% (21/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:30 | 1:40:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.24 | 304.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1124/1834) | 70% (1716/2466) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (684/1124) | 62% (1064/1716) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (360/710) | 47% (350/750) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (141/269) | 54% (212/391) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (909/1784) | 53% (1262/2377) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (14/0) | 91% (21/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (20/29) | 79% (33/42) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (20/19) | 92% (36/33) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (20/1) | 8% (36/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Kaitlin Quevedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Francesca Pace
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Emma Lene
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Marie Mettraux
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Carolina Kuhl
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Pemra Ozgen
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Draginja Vukovic
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Natalija Senic
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Irina Fetecau
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Vlada Katic
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Quevedo Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Quevedo are available here and Hennemann photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
