Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julian Ocleppo vs Michael Vrbensky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ocleppo vs Vrbensky analysis and find out who is favored!
Julian Ocleppo vs Michael Vrbensky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ocleppo has won 56.1% of points on his second serve, while Vrbensky has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ocleppo, in recent form, has won 42.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vrbensky has won 52.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.49% and 33.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ocleppo has saved 72.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vrbensky has saved 55.68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ocleppo has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 23/ 12), with Vrbensky winning 65.12% (W/L 56/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ocleppo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 61/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15). Vrbensky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 179/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Ocleppo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.19% of matches (W/L 16/ 5), where as Vrbensky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ocleppo winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ocleppo winning 2 and Vrbensky winning 1. The last match between Ocleppo and Vrbensky was at the Czech Republic F7 (Liberec), 28-10-2018, Final, Carpet with Julian Ocleppo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ocleppo and Vrbensky have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ocleppo winning 1 times and Vrbensky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ocleppo winning 0, and Vrbensky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ocleppo has played against opponents with an average rank of 298.6 while Vrbensky has played against players with an average rank of 303.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ocleppo has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vrbensky has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ocleppo has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vrbensky has converted 42.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ocleppo 1 - 0 Vrbensky
472
Rank
309
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
313
Rank
282
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
54% (182-157)
Career Total W/L
61% (259-165)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$7,255
Career Prize Money
$3,200
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Julian Ocleppo | Michael Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (56/91) | 54% (44/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (45/56) | 80% (35/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (17/35) | 55% (21/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (26/82) | 32% (29/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Michael Vrbensky
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
11
Aces
14
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julian Ocleppo | Michael Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (28/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (244/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 86 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 246.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (898/1513) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (608/898) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (292/615) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (74/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (659/1571) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Julian Ocleppo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Alexis Gautier
Player
Julian Ocleppo
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Laurent Lokoli
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Matej Dodig
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Julian Ocleppo
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Julian Ocleppo
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Julian Ocleppo
68%
(
75 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Vrbensky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Luka Mikrut
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Neil Oberleitner
58%
(
68 of
118)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
11
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
52%
(
26 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
44 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Gergely Madarasz
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Michael Vrbensky
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Botond Kisantal
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ocleppo Vs Vrbensky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
