Jonathan Chang vs Sem Verbeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chang vs Verbeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Chang vs Sem Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chang has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Verbeek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chang, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbeek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Verbeek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 36/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chang winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chang winning 2 and Verbeek winning 1. The last match between Chang and Verbeek was at the Canada F1 (Gatineau), 26-02-2018, Q3, I.hard with Jonathan Chang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chang and Verbeek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chang winning 1 times and Verbeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chang winning 0, and Verbeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chang has played against opponents with an average rank of while Verbeek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbeek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbeek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chang 1 - 0 Verbeek
Jonathan Chang
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
531
High
30
Age
L
Plays
Sem Verbeek
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
58% (124-89)
Career Total W/L
57% (104-78)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jonathan Chang | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 2:39:0 | 2:39:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (62/115) | 58% (49/85) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (39/62) | 59% (29/49) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (24/53) | 53% (19/36) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 30% (6/20) |
Return Points W% | 44% (37/85) | 45% (52/115) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 3-6 6-4 |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
62 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
24 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
52 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jonathan Chang | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jonathan Chang Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Andrew Watson
Player
Jonathan Chang
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
78%
(
56 of
72)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Cannon Kingsley
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Ronnie Schneider
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Dillon Early
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Jonathan Chang
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Roy Smith
Player
Jonathan Chang
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
74%
(
88 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Michael Redlicki
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Lucas Poullain
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jonathan Chang
Player
Alastair Gray
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more