Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John Sperle vs Marcello Serafini Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sperle vs Serafini analysis and find out who is favored!
John Sperle vs Marcello Serafini Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sperle has won 49.47% of points on his second serve, while Serafini has won 49.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sperle, in recent form, has won 55.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Serafini has won 52.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.78% and 31.59% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sperle has saved 57.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Serafini has saved 57.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sperle has won 63.51% of matches played (W/L 47/ 27), with Serafini winning 60.49% (W/L 49/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sperle has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 86/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Serafini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 26/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Sperle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.71% of matches (W/L 46/ 24), where as Serafini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.07% of matches (W/L 37/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sperle winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sperle winning 2 and Serafini winning 1. The last match between Sperle and Serafini was at the M15 Antalya, 08-02-2022, Q3, Clay with John Sperle getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sperle and Serafini have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sperle winning 1 times and Serafini 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sperle winning 0, and Serafini 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sperle has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.91 while Serafini has played against players with an average rank of 221.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sperle has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Serafini has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sperle has converted 47.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Serafini has converted 42.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sperle 1 - 0 Serafini
774
Rank
774
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
383
Rank
383
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (108-75)
Career Total W/L
56% (116-90)
68% (19-9)
YTD W/L
63% (22-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John Sperle | Marcello Serafini |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 22 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) | 59% (47/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 57% (27/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 38% (12/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (40/79) | 39% (24/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-0 12-10 |
Stats 
John Sperle
Player
Marcello Serafini
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Sperle | Marcello Serafini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (19/9) | 63% (22/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (41/21) | 59% (51/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (329/259) | 52% (431/393) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (14/5) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 180 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:30 | 1:40:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 33.57 | 179.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (973/1573) | 66% (1638/2467) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (647/973) | 70% (1150/1638) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (291/600) | 49% (407/829) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (93/193) | 43% (109/254) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (712/1571) | 39% (986/2512) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (19/9) | 67% (18/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (19/28) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 56% (9/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 89% (18/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 11% (18/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 35% (17/6) |
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Saba Purtseladze
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
John Sperle
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Louroi Martinez
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
John Sperle
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Gabriele Bosio
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Petr Brunclik
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcello Serafini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Marcello Serafini
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Raul Brancaccio
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Massimo Giunta
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Marcello Serafini
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Fausto Tabacco
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
12
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Marcello Serafini
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Yshai Oliel
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
77%
(
62 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Samuele Pieri
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sperle Vs Serafini Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For John Sperle
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
