Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper DE Jong vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper DE Jong vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jong 0 - 0 Spec
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Petr Nouza
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Marcello Serafini
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Jong Vs Spec Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
