Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jerome Kym vs Samir Banerjee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kym vs Banerjee analysis and find out who is favored!
Jerome Kym vs Samir Banerjee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 54.33% of points on his second serve, while Banerjee has won 47.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 51.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Banerjee has won 56.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.83% and 39.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 60.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Banerjee has saved 56.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 70.73% of matches played (W/L 29/ 12), with Banerjee winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Banerjee has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 15/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 20/ 6), where as Banerjee has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 13/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.93 while Banerjee has played against players with an average rank of 136.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Banerjee has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 40.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Banerjee has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kym 0 - 0 Banerjee
496
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
832
Rank
829
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
66% (88-46)
Career Total W/L
50% (23-23)
76% (16-5)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jerome Kym | Samir Banerjee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (16/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (32/11) | 63% (5/3) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (239/163) | 53% (39/34) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (6/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 111 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.49 |
| DFs Total | 32 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 149.81 | 201.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (817/1233) | 58% (149/256) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (596/817) | 70% (104/149) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (226/416) | 45% (48/107) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/158) | 34% (11/32) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (552/1300) | 42% (103/248) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (16/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (16/20) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Alexandr Binda
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Leonardo Malgaroli
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Jerome Kym
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Cian Maguire
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Jerome Kym
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Erik Tkalenko
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Samir Banerjee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Samir Banerjee
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
55
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(3) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Pablo Masjuan Ginel
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Samir Banerjee
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Samir Banerjee
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ozan Baris
Player
Samir Banerjee
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
William Grant
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Alafia Ayeni
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Alex Bancila
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kym Vs Banerjee Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
