Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeremy Beale vs Thomas Fancutt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Beale vs Fancutt analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeremy Beale vs Thomas Fancutt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Beale has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fancutt has won 49.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Beale, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fancutt has won 45.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Beale has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fancutt has saved 54.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Beale has won 77.78% of matches played (W/L 7/ 2), with Fancutt winning 43.24% (W/L 16/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Beale has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 109/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Fancutt has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 19/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Beale has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 7/ 2), where as Fancutt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Beale winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Beale winning 2 and Fancutt winning 0. The last match between Beale and Fancutt was at the M25 Darwin, 12-09-2023, First, Hard with Jeremy Beale getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Beale and Fancutt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Beale winning 0 times and Fancutt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Beale winning 1, and Fancutt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Beale has played against opponents with an average rank of 354.11 while Fancutt has played against players with an average rank of 185.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Beale has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fancutt has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Beale has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fancutt has converted 45.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Beale 1 - 0 Fancutt
825
Rank
459
High
29
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
782
Rank
382
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
57% (139-105)
Career Total W/L
53% (228-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jeremy Beale | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (48/75) | 68% (41/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (37/48) | 68% (28/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 53% (10/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (22/60) | 31% (23/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jeremy Beale
Player
Thomas Fancutt
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeremy Beale | Thomas Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (13/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.78 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 118 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 178.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (527/937) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 73% (385/527) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (203/410) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (32/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (325/926) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Jeremy Beale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jake Delaney
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Blake Mott
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Pavle Marinkov
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Kokoro Isomura
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Jeremy Beale
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
0
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Jacob Brumm
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Taiyo Yamanaka
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Beale
Player
Thomas Fancutt
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Delaney
Player
Jeremy Beale
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Thomas Fancutt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Thomas Fancutt
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
38%
(
24 of
63)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Thomas Fancutt
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Leonid Sheyngezikht
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Etienne Niyigena
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Thomas Fancutt
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Fancutt
Player
Francesco Ferrari
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thomas Fancutt
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Thomas Fancutt
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Beale Vs Fancutt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
