Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jasmine Paolini vs Patricia Maria Tig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paolini vs Tig analysis and find out who is favored!
Jasmine Paolini vs Patricia Maria Tig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paolini has won 47.38% of points on his second serve, while Tig has won 39.2%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paolini, in recent form, has won 55.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tig has won 49.57%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.04% and 37.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paolini has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tig has saved 44.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paolini has won 65.38% of matches played (W/L 51/ 27), with Tig winning 38.46% (W/L 10/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paolini has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 205/ 121), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13). Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 200/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Paolini has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 17/ 12), where as Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Paolini winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Paolini winning 2 and Tig winning 2. The last match between Paolini and Tig was at the Hobart International - Hobart, 09-01-2023, First, Hard with Jasmine Paolini getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paolini and Tig have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paolini winning 0 times and Tig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paolini winning 0, and Tig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paolini has played against opponents with an average rank of 125.9 while Tig has played against players with an average rank of 241.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paolini has won 72% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tig has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paolini has converted 53.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tig has converted 48.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paolini 1 - 1 Tig
13
Rank
13
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
473
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
58% (371-266)
Career Total W/L
62% (323-199)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$2,230,226
Career Prize Money
$584,816
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 14 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:48 | 1:1:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (69/97) | 64% (56/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (35/69) | 50% (28/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (10/28) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 53% (8/15) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (45/87) | 54% (52/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
49%
(
26 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Jasmine Paolini
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jasmine Paolini | Patricia Maria Tig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (36/21) | 29% (2/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (295/249) | 37% (21/36) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 1.07 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:8 | 1:25:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.6 | 303.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1184/1707) | 52% (101/193) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (746/1184) | 55% (56/101) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (248/523) | 38% (35/92) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (107/196) | 60% (9/15) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (803/1750) | 43% (80/185) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (16/25) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Jasmine Paolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Jasmine Paolini
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Rybakina
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Ons Jabeur
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Sara Errani
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jasmine Paolini
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Katie Volynets
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
69 of
83)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
44%
(
4 of
9)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
19
Total Points Won
16
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-0 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Martha Matoula
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
11
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
54 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
114)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Paolini Vs Tig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
