Jasmijn Gimbrere vs Vitalia Stamat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimbrere vs Stamat analysis and find out who is favored!
Jasmijn Gimbrere vs Vitalia Stamat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimbrere has won 43.51% of points on his second serve, while Stamat has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimbrere, in recent form, has won 56.31% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stamat has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.58% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimbrere has saved 58.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stamat has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimbrere has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 21/ 24), with Stamat winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimbrere has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 42/ 34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Stamat has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 70/ 56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 13/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Gimbrere has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.73% of matches (W/L 21/ 23), where as Stamat has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gimbrere winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gimbrere winning 1 and Stamat winning 2. The last match between Gimbrere and Stamat was at the W15 Sharm El Sheikh, 03-11-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Vitalia Stamat getting the victory 7-5 3-6 10-7.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimbrere and Stamat have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gimbrere winning 0 times and Stamat 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gimbrere winning 0, and Stamat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimbrere has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.82 while Stamat has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimbrere has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stamat has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimbrere has converted 44.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stamat has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimbrere 0 - 1 Stamat
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
656
Rank
442
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
802
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (115-101)
Career Total W/L
55% (83-67)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jasmijn Gimbrere | Vitalia Stamat |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 18 | 20 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 3-6 10-7 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jasmijn Gimbrere | Vitalia Stamat |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (25/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (233/235) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.34 | 0 |
DFs Total | 78 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:21 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 252.5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (944/1565) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (584/944) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 43% (266/621) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (87/190) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (671/1481) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Sina Herrmann
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
13
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Julie Struplova
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Basant Kaur
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
62%
(
88 of
143)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
4
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
5
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
45%
(
25 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
14 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
65 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
131
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Julie Tungamirai
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lian Tran
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Beverley Nyangon
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
70 of
120)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
32 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Vitalia Stamat Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Caroline Vernet
Player
Vitalia Stamat
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
0
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
7
Total Points Won
6
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Nina Potocnik
Player
Vitalia Stamat
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
18
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vitalia Stamat
Player
Melis Ayda Uyar
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H |
view more