Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Varvara Flink Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Flink analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Varvara Flink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 40.28% of points on his second serve, while Flink has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 53.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Flink has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.59% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Flink has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 50% of matches played (W/L 18/ 18), with Flink winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Flink has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 128/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 7/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 12/ 12), where as Flink has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fourlis winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fourlis winning 2 and Flink winning 2. The last match between Fourlis and Flink was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 29-12-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fourlis and Flink have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fourlis winning 0 times and Flink 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fourlis winning 1, and Flink 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.5 while Flink has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Flink has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 53.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Flink has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fourlis 1 - 1 Flink
305
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
883
Rank
122
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (204-153)
Career Total W/L
63% (229-136)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$322,878
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Varvara Flink |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:55 | 1:37:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (82/143) | 65% (87/134) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (48/82) | 66% (57/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (27/61) | 43% (20/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (7/17) | 57% (8/14) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (57/134) | 48% (68/143) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Varvara Flink
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Varvara Flink
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Varvara Flink |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (16/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (166/176) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:31 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 189.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (706/1096) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (402/706) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (165/390) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (71/130) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (529/1147) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Despina Papamichail
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Varvara Flink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Varvara Flink
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Varvara Flink
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
11
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ellen Perez
Player
Varvara Flink
43%
(
18 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Varvara Flink
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Flink
Player
Panna Udvardy
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
98)
5
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Varvara Flink
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
7
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
39 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Varvara Flink
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Flink
Player
Grace Min
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Varvara Flink
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Varvara Flink
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Flink Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
