Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Tyler Zink Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Zink analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Tyler Zink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 50.77% of points on his second serve, while Zink has won 44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 50.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zink has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.21% and 31.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 62.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zink has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 38/ 19), with Zink winning 28.57% (W/L 4/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8), where as Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Draper winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Zink winning 0. The last match between Draper and Zink was at the M25 Fort Worth, 23-10-2019, First, Hard with Jack Draper getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Zink have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Zink 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Zink 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.26 while Zink has played against players with an average rank of 265.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zink has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 48.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zink has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 0 Zink
40
Rank
37
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
69% (202-91)
Career Total W/L
44% (33-42)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,489,740
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jack Draper | Tyler Zink |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) | 53% (31/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 58% (18/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 33% (9/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (31/58) | 32% (17/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Tyler Zink |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (35/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (311/256) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 159 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 100.05 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1013/1728) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (775/1013) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (359/715) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (76/157) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (663/1735) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (12/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Borna Coric
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
8 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
43 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Jack Draper
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Draper Vs Zink Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
