Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Iman Khan vs Tamara Kostic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Khan vs Kostic analysis and find out who is favored!
Iman Khan vs Tamara Kostic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Khan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kostic has won 43.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Khan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kostic has won 58.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 41.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Khan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kostic has saved 57.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Khan has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 4/ 3), with Kostic winning 66.04% (W/L 35/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11). Kostic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 36/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Khan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1), where as Kostic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Khan winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Khan winning 1 and Kostic winning 2. The last match between Khan and Kostic was at the W15 Don Benito, 18-07-2021, Q1 round, Carpet with Tamara Kostic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Khan and Kostic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Khan winning 0 times and Kostic 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Khan winning 1, and Kostic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Khan has played against opponents with an average rank of 75.86 while Kostic has played against players with an average rank of 238.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Khan has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kostic has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Khan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kostic has converted 55.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Khan 0 - 1 Kostic
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
674
Rank
666
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
39% (14-22)
Career Total W/L
62% (55-34)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Iman Khan | Tamara Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 21 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 10-8 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Iman Khan | Tamara Kostic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (145/145) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.57 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 335.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (618/983) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (368/618) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (155/365) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 58% (59/102) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (392/838) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Iman Khan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Lavinia Morreale
Player
Iman Khan
54%
(
13 of
24)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
28
Total Points Won
18
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Iman Khan
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iman Khan
Player
Maria Oliver Sanchez
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iman Khan
Player
Rinko Matsuda
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(5) 0-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlada Mincheva
Player
Iman Khan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Kostic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Jessica Failla
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Carmen Lopez Martinez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alena Kovackova
Player
Tamara Kostic
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
11
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Tamara Kostic
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Anja Wildgruber
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Kostic
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Tauson
Player
Tamara Kostic
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Khan Vs Kostic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tamara Kostic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
