Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ilinca Dalina Amariei vs Jana Fett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Amariei vs Fett analysis and find out who is favored!
Ilinca Dalina Amariei vs Jana Fett Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amariei has won 47.48% of points on his second serve, while Fett has won 44.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amariei, in recent form, has won 57.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fett has won 62.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.69% and 45.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Amariei has saved 43.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fett has saved 56.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Amariei has won 55.22% of matches played (W/L 37/ 30), with Fett winning 68.85% (W/L 42/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Amariei has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 141/ 78), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Fett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 111/ 64), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 89/ 71).
- Player level: In the last year, Amariei has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 35/ 28), where as Fett has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.47% of matches (W/L 35/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amariei has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.16 while Fett has played against players with an average rank of 238.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amariei has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fett has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Amariei has converted 49.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fett has converted 49.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Amariei 0 - 0 Fett
327
Rank
317
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
150
Rank
97
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
63% (147-86)
Career Total W/L
60% (346-233)
60% (15-10)
YTD W/L
71% (17-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$384,128
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ilinca Dalina Amariei | Jana Fett |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (15/10) | 71% (17/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 69% (37/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (245/219) | 58% (276/196) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 83% (10/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 24 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:14 | 1:35:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.28 | 231.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1070/1501) | 68% (1056/1561) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (585/1070) | 60% (636/1056) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (199/431) | 45% (226/505) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (117/238) | 49% (130/263) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (774/1561) | 52% (839/1628) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (15/10) | 77% (17/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (15/25) | 71% (17/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Ilinca Dalina Amariei Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Nina Vargova
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Rocchetti
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Denislava Glushkova
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Emeline Dartron
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ane Mintegi Del Olmo
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jana Fett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Panna Udvardy
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Yuliia Starodubtseva
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Irina Maria Bara
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Polona Hercog
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Jana Fett
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Panna Udvardy
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Amariei Vs Fett Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
