Igor Shrolik vs Cengiz AKSU Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shrolik vs AKSU analysis and find out who is favored!
Igor Shrolik vs Cengiz AKSU Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shrolik has won 0% of points on his second serve, while AKSU has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shrolik, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while AKSU has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shrolik has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas AKSU has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shrolik has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with AKSU winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shrolik has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). AKSU has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shrolik has played against opponents with an average rank of while AKSU has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shrolik has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while AKSU has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shrolik has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and AKSU has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shrolik 0 - 0 AKSU
Igor Shrolik
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
Cengiz AKSU
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Igor Shrolik | Cengiz AKSU |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Igor Shrolik Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Vasile Antonescu
Player
Igor Shrolik
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Igor Shrolik
Player
Igor Trunov
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Federico Campana
Player
Igor Shrolik
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Igor Shrolik
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Igor Shrolik
Player
Berk Ilkel
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Igor Shrolik
Player
Yanaki Milev
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Cengiz AKSU Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Cengiz Aksu
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Kanan Gasimov
62%
(
84 of
136)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
62 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
133
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Cengiz Aksu
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Louis Van Herck
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more