Harold Mayot vs Illya Beloborodko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mayot vs Beloborodko analysis and find out who is favored!
Harold Mayot vs Illya Beloborodko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mayot 0 - 0 Beloborodko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mayot has won 51.43% of points on his second serve, while Beloborodko has won 49.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mayot, in recent form, has won 51.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beloborodko has won 52.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.17% and 31.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mayot has saved 66.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beloborodko has saved 63.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mayot has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Beloborodko winning 53.49% (W/L 23/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mayot has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 80% (W/L 4/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 39). Beloborodko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 44/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Mayot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Beloborodko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mayot has played against opponents with an average rank of 281.57 while Beloborodko has played against players with an average rank of 74.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mayot has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beloborodko has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mayot has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beloborodko has converted 44.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
121
Rank
112
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
652
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
55% (138-114)
Career Total W/L
56% (108-85)
58% (23-17)
YTD W/L
65% (17-9)
$157,465
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mayot VS Beloborodko H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Harold Mayot | Illya Beloborodko |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (23/17) | 65% (17/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (51/39) | 64% (38/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (460/405) | 57% (306/231) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 61% (11/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 75% (6/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.26 |
Aces Total | 198 | 69 |
DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 111 | 71 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:21 | 1:10:18 |
Avg Opp Rank | 255.28 | 75.96 |
1st Serve % | 60% (1700/2816) | 61% (700/1145) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (1184/1700) | 69% (483/700) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (574/1116) | 49% (220/445) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (116/236) | 45% (49/110) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (1050/2689) | 40% (466/1160) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/9) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (22/37) | 64% (16/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 40% (2/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 38% (3/8) |
1st set W, W | 86% (22/19) | 83% (18/15) |
1st set W, L | 14% (22/3) | 17% (18/3) |
1st set L, W | 17% (18/3) | 25% (8/2) |
Harold Mayot Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Harold Mayot
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Lamasine
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Harold Mayot
53%
(
57 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
56%
(
28 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
39 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Terence Atmane
Player
Harold Mayot
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Harold Mayot
Player
Valentin Vacherot
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richard Gasquet
Player
Harold Mayot
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cameron Norrie
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harold Mayot
Player
Pedro Cachin
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
107)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Illya Beloborodko Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Illya Beloborodko
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
46 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
43 of
93)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Radu David Turcanu
Player
Illya Beloborodko
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
56 of
127)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Nicolas Ifi
Player
Illya Beloborodko
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Robin Bertrand
Player
Illya Beloborodko
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more