Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hady Habib vs Elmar Ejupovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Habib vs Ejupovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Hady Habib vs Elmar Ejupovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Habib has won 51.46% of points on his second serve, while Ejupovic has won 50.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Habib, in recent form, has won 49.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ejupovic has won 48.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.12% and 24.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Habib has saved 64.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ejupovic has saved 67.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Habib has won 68.04% of matches played (W/L 66/ 31), with Ejupovic winning 39.13% (W/L 18/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Habib has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 173/ 82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16). Ejupovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 172/ 137), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Habib has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.36% of matches (W/L 48/ 11), where as Ejupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 10/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Habib winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Habib winning 2 and Ejupovic winning 1. The last match between Habib and Ejupovic was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 11-04-2022, Q3, Clay with Hady Habib getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:31.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Habib and Ejupovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Habib winning 1 times and Ejupovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Habib winning 1, and Ejupovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Habib has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.52 while Ejupovic has played against players with an average rank of 214.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Habib has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ejupovic has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Habib has converted 38.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ejupovic has converted 36.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Habib 1 - 0 Ejupovic
286
Rank
286
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
551
Rank
273
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
65% (272-148)
Career Total W/L
57% (355-268)
52% (16-15)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,215
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hady Habib | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:31 | 2:11:31 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (58/101) | 62% (48/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (43/58) | 83% (40/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (21/43) | 67% (20/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 23% (18/78) | 37% (37/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Hady Habib
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
58 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
4
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
5
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hady Habib | Elmar Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (16/15) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (38/36) | 48% (20/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (361/355) | 49% (207/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 197 | 122 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 112 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:34 | 1:46:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.32 | 314.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1323/2208) | 62% (820/1319) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (935/1323) | 73% (602/820) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (452/885) | 50% (250/499) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (81/217) | 37% (34/92) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (880/2299) | 34% (432/1285) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 36% (5/9) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (16/31) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Hady Habib Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Igor Gimenez
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Hady Habib
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Hady Habib
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Denis Kudla
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Millen Hurrion
Player
Hady Habib
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Leonardo Rossi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
109)
21
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
109)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Hady Habib
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
47%
(
57 of
122)
6
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Tiago Pereira
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
4
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elmar Ejupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Andres Delgadillo
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Diego Bustamante
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
11
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Ryan Seggerman
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
9 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Habib Vs Ejupovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hady Habib
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
