Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gonzalo Lama vs Federico Coria Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lama vs Coria analysis and find out who is favored!
Gonzalo Lama vs Federico Coria Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lama has won 52.34% of points on his second serve, while Coria has won 44.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lama, in recent form, has won 46.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coria has won 55.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.53% and 36.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lama has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coria has saved 53.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lama has won 45.71% of matches played (W/L 16/ 19), with Coria winning 59.49% (W/L 47/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Coria has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 572/ 337), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14), where as Coria has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Lama winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Lama winning 4 and Coria winning 3. The last match between Lama and Coria was at the Buenos Aires Challenger, 11-11-2018, Q2 round, Clay with Federico Coria getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lama and Coria have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lama winning 1 times and Coria 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lama winning 0, and Coria 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lama has played against opponents with an average rank of 337.11 while Coria has played against players with an average rank of 254.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lama has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coria has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lama has converted 10% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coria has converted 45.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lama 2 - 1 Coria
522
Rank
160
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
83
Rank
49
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
57% (381-282)
Career Total W/L
61% (588-383)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
59% (19-13)
$18,335
Career Prize Money
$927,550
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gonzalo Lama | Federico Coria |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 36 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:52:4 | 0:52:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (76/121) | 72% (93/129) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (51/76) | 53% (49/93) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (22/45) | 50% (18/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 58% (7/12) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (62/129) | 40% (48/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Federico Coria
Player
Gonzalo Lama
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Federico Coria
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gonzalo Lama | Federico Coria |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 59% (19/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 56% (42/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 53% (369/332) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 61% (19/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:1 | 1:49:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 481 | 177.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 38% (17/45) | 67% (1497/2228) |
| 1st Serve W% | 47% (8/17) | 65% (966/1497) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 36% (10/28) | 46% (333/731) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 46% (121/264) |
| Return Pts W% | 27% (12/44) | 44% (982/2238) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (8/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 63% (19/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Coria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Federico Coria
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Frances Tiafoe
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Fabio Fognini
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
64)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Federico Coria
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Federico Coria
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Lama Vs Coria Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
