Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Georgia Andreea Craciun vs Ipek Oz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Craciun vs Oz analysis and find out who is favored!
Georgia Andreea Craciun vs Ipek Oz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Craciun 0 - 1 Oz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Craciun has won 47.11% of points on their second serve, while Oz has won 47.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Craciun, in recent form, has won 57.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Oz has won 53.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.33% and 38.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Craciun has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Oz has saved 53.36% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Craciun has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 21/ 11), with Oz winning 55.71% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Craciun has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 48/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Oz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 195/ 135), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Craciun has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9), where as Oz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Craciun winning 0 times and Oz being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Craciun winning 0 and Oz winning 2. The last match between Craciun and Oz was at the W60 Brasov, 31-05-2022, First, Clay with Ipek Oz getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Craciun and Oz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Craciun winning 0 times and Oz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Craciun winning 0, and Oz 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Craciun has played against opponents with an average rank of 180.59 while Oz has played against players with an average rank of 295.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Craciun has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Oz has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Craciun has converted 43.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Oz has converted 49.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
650
Rank
347
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
197
Rank
163
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
67% (205-103)
Career Total W/L
56% (247-198)
75% (6-2)
YTD W/L
57% (17-13)
$1,005
Career Prize Money
$42,295
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Georgia Andreea Craciun | Ipek Oz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (33/56) | 69% (38/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 52% (17/33) | 74% (28/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (10/23) | 65% (11/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (16/55) | 52% (29/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-0 |
Stats 
Ipek Oz
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Georgia Andreea Craciun | Ipek Oz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (6/2) | 57% (17/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 72% (13/5) | 54% (37/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (104/81) | 50% (306/302) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 61% (11/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.6 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 43 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:35:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 306.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (347/589) | 69% (1268/1851) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (220/347) | 58% (741/1268) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (114/242) | 46% (271/583) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (43/99) | 49% (103/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (299/608) | 44% (811/1849) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (15/10) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (6/8) | 57% (16/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 88% (16/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 13% (16/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Georgia Andreea Craciun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Anamaria Federica Oana
52%
(
56 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
61 of
117)
3
Aces
3
14
Double Faults
13
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
55%
(
12 of
22)
Break Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
60 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
68 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Ioana Teodora Sava
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Lidia Encheva
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Alice Nicoleta Petrache
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioana Zvonaru
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Daria Stefania Malaescu
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgia Andreea Craciun
Player
Cara Maria Mester
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
51%
(
71 of
138)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
18
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
68 of
138)
130
Total Points Won
126
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ipek Oz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Ipek Oz
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
46
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noma Akugue Noha
Player
Ipek Oz
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
49 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Ipek Oz
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Marina Stakusic
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dalila Spiteri
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Denisa Hindova
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Ipek Oz
83%
(
45 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leyre Romero Gormaz
Player
Ipek Oz
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
92)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Lara Schmidt
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Craciun Vs Oz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Georgia Andreea Craciun
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
