Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Garrett Johns vs Pedro VIVES Marcos Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johns vs Marcos analysis and find out who is favored!
Garrett Johns vs Pedro VIVES Marcos Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johns has won 48.59% of points on his second serve, while Marcos has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johns, in recent form, has won 51.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marcos has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johns has saved 68.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marcos has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johns has won 68.52% of matches played (W/L 37/ 17), with Marcos winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johns has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 64/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Marcos has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Johns has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.17% of matches (W/L 30/ 11), where as Marcos has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johns has played against opponents with an average rank of 127.22 while Marcos has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johns has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marcos has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johns has converted 44.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marcos has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Johns 0 - 0 Marcos
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Garrett Johns | Pedro VIVES Marcos |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (113/91) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 40 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 78.22 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (369/629) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (268/369) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (132/260) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (32/68) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (285/690) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
Garrett Johns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Garrett Johns
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
William Grant
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Rudy Quan
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Alexander Razeghi
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Ben Jones
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Garrett Johns
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
51 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Garrett Johns
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Garrett Johns
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
42 of
81)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Francisco Rocha
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Garrett Johns
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Pedro VIVES Marcos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
4-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
3
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cooper Williams
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Bernard Tomic
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Cannon Kingsley
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Vives Marcos
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Cozbinov
Player
Pedro Vives Marcos
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Johns Vs Marcos Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
