Francisco Clavet vs Potito Starace Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Clavet 1 - 0 Starace
They have played 3 sets in total, with Clavet winning 2 and Starace winning 1. The last match between Clavet and Starace was at the French Open - Paris, 26-05-2003, Q1 round, Clay with Francisco Clavet getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 1 |
| Potito Starace | 0 |
French Open - Paris(26-05-2003)
1
6
6
4
6
0
| Clavet | Stats | Starace |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 115 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 56 | Age | 43 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 11 |
| 54% (419-364) | Career Total W/L | 56% (456-358) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $930,620 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Djokovic PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-0 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Francisco Clavet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 8-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Potito Starace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Gianluca Naso
Player
Potito Starace
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
62 of
81)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximo Gonzalez
Player
Potito Starace
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Chase Buchanan
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Potito Starace
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
64 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Aljaz Bedene
Player
Potito Starace
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Kyle Edmund
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Andrej Martin
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-0 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Potito Starace
Player
Konstantin Kravchuk
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
16 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
27 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Potito Starace
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (419/364) | Win/Loss | 56% (456/358) |
| 53% (1029/925) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1069/880) |
| 51% (9484/9010) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9609/8931) |
| 50% (107/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 37% (34/59) |
| 58% (283/208) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (394/242) |
| 33% (18/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (24/43) |
| 50% (11/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 22% (4/14) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 1102 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 567 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 317.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 570.85 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 73% (24054/32991) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (16086/24072) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4688/8942) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1210/2955) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 38% (12383/32993) |
| 48% (41/44) | Slam W/L | 37% (25/42) |
| 49% (67/70) | Masters W/L | 29% (17/41) |
| 100% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 79% (15/4) |
| 56% (292/233) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (147/142) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (16/17) | Challenger W/L | 66% (251/127) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 54% (373/693) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (430/746) |
| 49% (42/85) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 48% (113/233) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (148/287) |
| 49% (131/266) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (126/248) |
| 84% (396/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (451/387) |
| 16% (396/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (451/64) |
| 22% (387/86) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (363/70) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
