Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fermin Tenti vs Vilius Gaubas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tenti vs Gaubas analysis and find out who is favored!
Fermin Tenti vs Vilius Gaubas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tenti has won 46.63% of points on his second serve, while Gaubas has won 48.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tenti, in recent form, has won 53.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gaubas has won 53.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.71% and 37.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tenti has saved 58.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gaubas has saved 55.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tenti has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Gaubas winning 67.07% (W/L 55/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tenti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 211/ 188), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 26/ 32). Gaubas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 90/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Tenti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 30/ 27), where as Gaubas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.91% of matches (W/L 39/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tenti winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tenti winning 1 and Gaubas winning 2. The last match between Tenti and Gaubas was at the M15 Cairo, 13-04-2022, First, Clay with Vilius Gaubas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tenti and Gaubas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tenti winning 0 times and Gaubas 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tenti winning 0, and Gaubas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tenti has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.7 while Gaubas has played against players with an average rank of 286.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tenti has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gaubas has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tenti has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gaubas has converted 45.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tenti 0 - 1 Gaubas
893
Rank
561
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
345
Rank
309
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
52% (237-220)
Career Total W/L
63% (105-61)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
69% (24-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Fermin Tenti | Vilius Gaubas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:34:0 | 2:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (71/91) | 76% (66/87) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (41/71) | 71% (47/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 38% (8/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (32/87) | 43% (39/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Fermin Tenti
76%
(
66 of
87)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fermin Tenti | Vilius Gaubas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 69% (24/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 63% (51/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (273/235) | 54% (422/354) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 72% (18/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 85 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:2 | 1:49:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 68.82 | 318.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (763/1135) | 66% (1495/2277) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (457/763) | 68% (1011/1495) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (173/372) | 49% (382/782) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (63/135) | 44% (120/270) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (512/1129) | 43% (1045/2430) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (13/9) | 73% (11/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 69% (24/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 73% (8/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 95% (20/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 5% (20/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 33% (15/5) |
Fermin Tenti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
71%
(
102 of
144)
1st Serve %
56%
(
90 of
161)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
72 of
161)
157
Total Points Won
148
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Franco Ribero
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Nicolas Villalon
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Nicolas Bruna
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Fermin Tenti
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Monzon
Player
Fermin Tenti
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
88 of
124)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
64 of
124)
115
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Manuel La Serna
Player
Fermin Tenti
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Alberto Alvarado Berrospi
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikos Lehmann
Player
Fermin Tenti
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Vilius Gaubas
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Hugo Dellien
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Matteo Martineau
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Tommaso Compagnucci
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vilius Gaubas
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tenti Vs Gaubas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
