Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Campana vs Igor Shrolik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Campana vs Shrolik analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Campana vs Igor Shrolik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Campana has won 50.87% of points on his second serve, while Shrolik has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Campana, in recent form, has won 55.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shrolik has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.13% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Campana has saved 56.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shrolik has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Campana has won 55% of matches played (W/L 33/ 27), with Shrolik winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Campana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 109/ 81), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 109/ 81). Shrolik has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 40/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Campana has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 26), where as Shrolik has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Campana winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Campana winning 2 and Shrolik winning 1. The last match between Campana and Shrolik was at the M15 Antalya, 23-11-2022, First, Clay with Federico Campana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Campana and Shrolik have played a deciding set 1 times, with Campana winning 1 times and Shrolik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Campana winning 0, and Shrolik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Campana has played against opponents with an average rank of 71.33 while Shrolik has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Campana has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shrolik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Campana has converted 42.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shrolik has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Campana 1 - 0 Shrolik
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (109-81)
Career Total W/L
50% (56-57)
60% (9-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Federico Campana | Igor Shrolik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:0 | 2:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (65/95) | 61% (52/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (42/65) | 60% (31/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 52% (17/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (37/85) | 38% (36/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Federico Campana
Player
Igor Shrolik
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Campana | Igor Shrolik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (19/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (171/139) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 36.6 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (393/707) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (250/393) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (150/314) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (46/106) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (356/761) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Federico Campana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
40%
(
22 of
55)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maksim Shin
Player
Federico Campana
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Karan Singh
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Ruslan Kastsiukevich
49%
(
18 of
37)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Yerassyl Yerdilda
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
85%
(
44 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Artem Sidorov
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michel Hopp
Player
Federico Campana
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anthony Genov
Player
Federico Campana
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Igor Shrolik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Vasile Antonescu
Player
Igor Shrolik
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Igor Shrolik
Player
Igor Trunov
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Igor Shrolik
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Igor Shrolik
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Shrolik
Player
Berk Ilkel
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Igor Shrolik
Player
Yanaki Milev
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Campana Vs Shrolik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
