Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Gonzalo Lama Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Lama analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Gonzalo Lama Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mena 4 - 2 Lama
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.47% of points on their second serve, while Lama has won 35.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lama has won 35.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.07% and 22.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 60.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lama has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 69.51% of matches played (W/L 57/ 25), with Lama winning 48.28% (W/L 14/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.36% of matches (W/L 27/ 17), where as Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Mena winning 4 times and Lama being victorious 2 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Mena winning 9 and Lama winning 6. The last match between Mena and Lama was at the Concepcion Challenger, 21-01-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Gonzalo Lama getting the victory 6-1 2-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Lama have played a deciding set 3 times, with Mena winning 2 times and Lama 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 2, and Lama 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.35 while Lama has played against players with an average rank of 368.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lama has won 82% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 52.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lama has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
307
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
0
Hard0
4
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
543
Rank
160
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (472-356)
Career Total W/L
57% (381-282)
68% (30-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$18,335
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Facundo Mena vs Gonzalo Lama For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mena VS Lama
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Facundo Mena | Gonzalo Lama |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 9 | 6 |
| Games Won | 69 | 72 |
| Aces (Total) | 57 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 17 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:51 | 1:26:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (209/363) | 65% (252/389) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (162/209) | 68% (171/252) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (81/154) | 52% (71/137) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (13/27) | 40% (10/25) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (147/389) | 33% (120/363) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (4/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Mena
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Gonzalo Lama
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Gonzalo Lama
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
18
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Gonzalo Lama
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Gonzalo Lama |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (30/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (63/34) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (508/389) | 14% (2/12) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 68% (27/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 178 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:44 | 1:10:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 314.36 | 481 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1519/2710) | 38% (17/45) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1079/1519) | 47% (8/17) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (613/1191) | 36% (10/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (166/319) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1296/2900) | 27% (12/44) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (17/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (30/44) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (26/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 28% (18/5) | 0% (1/0) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Facundo Mena
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
84 of
118)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
60 of
84)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
27 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Facundo Mena
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Emilio Gomez
55%
(
60 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Lama Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mena are available here and Lama photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Facundo Mena
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
