Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Gijs Brouwer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Brouwer analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Gijs Brouwer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.91% of points on his second serve, while Brouwer has won 51.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brouwer has won 49.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.22% and 29.01% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 61.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brouwer has saved 63.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 70.13% of matches played (W/L 54/ 23), with Brouwer winning 44.07% (W/L 26/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 82/ 69).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.74% of matches (W/L 33/ 10), where as Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 16/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mena winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mena winning 0 and Brouwer winning 2. The last match between Mena and Brouwer was at the U.S. Open - New York, 25-08-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Brouwer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mena winning 0 times and Brouwer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 0, and Brouwer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.92 while Brouwer has played against players with an average rank of 208.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brouwer has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 50.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brouwer has converted 32.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 0 - 1 Brouwer
406
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
252
Rank
114
High
28
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
57% (466-352)
Career Total W/L
58% (309-226)
71% (24-10)
YTD W/L
50% (12-12)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$277,135
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Mena | Gijs Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:0 | 1:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (36/68) | 66% (39/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (20/36) | 72% (28/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (16/32) | 65% (13/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (18/59) | 47% (32/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Facundo Mena
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Gijs Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (24/10) | 50% (12/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (51/24) | 48% (25/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (391/269) | 51% (264/255) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (21/9) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 143 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:10 | 1:33:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 342.71 | 262.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1088/1975) | 68% (1118/1644) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (792/1088) | 69% (771/1118) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (459/887) | 52% (272/526) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (131/240) | 34% (56/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (953/2096) | 38% (644/1694) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (11/6) | 50% (9/9) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (24/34) | 50% (12/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 15% (13/2) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Karue Sell
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kaichi Uchida
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Aboian
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
37%
(
25 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Thomas Brown
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Gijs Brouwer
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Denis Kudla
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Hady Habib
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Gijs Brouwer
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dominik Palan
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Gijs Brouwer
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Tristan Boyer
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Gijs Brouwer
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Brouwer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Facundo Mena
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
