Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Bagnis vs Jakub Mensik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bagnis vs Mensik analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Bagnis vs Jakub Mensik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bagnis has won 52.3% of points on his second serve, while Mensik has won 51.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bagnis, in recent form, has won 50.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mensik has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.95% and 27.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bagnis has saved 65.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mensik has saved 68.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bagnis has won 63.77% of matches played (W/L 44/ 25), with Mensik winning 66.18% (W/L 45/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 594/ 366), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 37/ 26).
- Player level: In the last year, Bagnis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.89% of matches (W/L 23/ 13), where as Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.98% of matches (W/L 25/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bagnis winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bagnis winning 0 and Mensik winning 2. The last match between Bagnis and Mensik was at the Prostejov Challenger, 07-06-2023, Second, Clay with Jakub Mensik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bagnis and Mensik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bagnis winning 0 times and Mensik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bagnis winning 0, and Mensik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bagnis has played against opponents with an average rank of 294.2 while Mensik has played against players with an average rank of 220.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bagnis has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mensik has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bagnis has converted 41.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mensik has converted 41.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bagnis 0 - 1 Mensik
136
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
74
Rank
69
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (633-436)
Career Total W/L
65% (95-51)
71% (25-10)
YTD W/L
71% (20-8)
$1,262,620
Career Prize Money
$645,030
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:51 | 1:16:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (37/64) | 60% (24/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 49% (18/37) | 83% (20/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (12/27) | 63% (10/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 25% (10/40) | 53% (34/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Jakub Mensik
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (25/10) | 71% (20/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (52/28) | 67% (44/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (421/368) | 53% (346/307) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 71% (17/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (24/8) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.75 |
| Aces Total | 129 | 239 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:55 | 1:45:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 283.4 | 176.36 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1652/2592) | 59% (1259/2119) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1128/1652) | 74% (933/1259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (489/940) | 53% (457/860) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (110/268) | 44% (61/140) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1051/2578) | 35% (700/1975) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 71% (5/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (25/34) | 73% (19/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 67% (10/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (22/22) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (22/0) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 14% (7/1) |
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Facundo Bagnis
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
David Goffin
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jakub Mensik
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
59%
(
74 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
16
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
9
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(12) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bagnis Vs Mensik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
