Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Bagnis vs Alex Rybakov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bagnis vs Rybakov analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Bagnis vs Alex Rybakov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bagnis has won 51.92% of points on his second serve, while Rybakov has won 51.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bagnis, in recent form, has won 49.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rybakov has won 53.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.6% and 34.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bagnis has saved 65.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rybakov has saved 63.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bagnis has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Rybakov winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 595/ 367), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Rybakov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 154/ 92), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bagnis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Rybakov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bagnis winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Bagnis winning 4 and Rybakov winning 2. The last match between Bagnis and Rybakov was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 24-06-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Facundo Bagnis getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bagnis and Rybakov have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bagnis winning 2 times and Rybakov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bagnis winning 0, and Rybakov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bagnis has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.12 while Rybakov has played against players with an average rank of 241.28.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bagnis has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rybakov has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bagnis has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rybakov has converted 40.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bagnis 2 - 0 Rybakov
119
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
559
Rank
289
High
27
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
59% (634-437)
Career Total W/L
59% (257-177)
70% (26-11)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$1,274,440
Career Prize Money
$18,215
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Alex Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 30 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:28 | 2:8:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (89/148) | 72% (141/195) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (69/89) | 64% (90/141) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (35/59) | 43% (23/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (8/24) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (82/195) | 30% (44/148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alex Rybakov
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alex Rybakov
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Alex Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (26/11) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (54/30) | 60% (34/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (439/392) | 56% (297/236) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (25/9) | 60% (12/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 139 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 89 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:57 | 1:43:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.14 | 208.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1748/2740) | 64% (1063/1660) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1187/1748) | 71% (756/1063) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (518/992) | 52% (308/597) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (113/274) | 40% (81/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1098/2717) | 42% (713/1705) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 43% (3/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (26/36) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 100% (13/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 0% (13/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 15% (13/2) |
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Facundo Bagnis
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alex Rybakov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Alex Rybakov
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Alex Rybakov
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Rei Sakamoto
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Alex Rybakov
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Alex Rybakov
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Louis Wessels
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Alex Rybakov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 4-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Ignacio Carou
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Alex Rybakov
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bagnis Vs Rybakov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
