Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evgeny Donskoy vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Donskoy vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Evgeny Donskoy vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Donskoy has won 52.64% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 47.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Donskoy, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 48.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.42% and 28.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Donskoy has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 60.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Donskoy has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Zandschulp winning 44% (W/L 22/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Donskoy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 252/ 171), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 16/ 27). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Donskoy has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Donskoy winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Donskoy winning 1 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Donskoy and Zandschulp was at the St. Petersburg Open - St. Petersburg, 25-10-2021, Q3, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Donskoy and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Donskoy winning 0 times and Zandschulp 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Donskoy winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Donskoy has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.52 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 165.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Donskoy has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Donskoy has converted 40.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 35.56% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Donskoy 0 - 1 Zandschulp
319
Rank
65
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
55% (535-443)
Career Total W/L
63% (328-195)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
36% (8-14)
$1,427,945
Career Prize Money
$2,870,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Donskoy VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Evgeny Donskoy | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (62/98) | 67% (52/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (47/62) | 88% (46/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 31% (11/36) | 50% (13/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (19/78) | 41% (40/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Donskoy VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
46 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
24%
(
19 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evgeny Donskoy | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 36% (8/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (19/24) | 37% (18/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (188/195) | 46% (223/267) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (9/10) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 104 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:3 | 1:45:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 253.47 | 169.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (685/1206) | 63% (970/1543) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (494/685) | 68% (664/970) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (263/521) | 47% (270/573) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (40/114) | 36% (45/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (452/1216) | 37% (561/1528) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 40% (8/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 7% (14/1) |
Evgeny Donskoy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Remy Bertola
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Florent Bax
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
47
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Kabir Hans
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Oliver Crawford
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Donskoy Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
