Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Estelle Cascino vs Jaimee Fourlis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cascino vs Fourlis analysis and find out who is favored!
Estelle Cascino vs Jaimee Fourlis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cascino has won 41.07% of points on his second serve, while Fourlis has won 39.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cascino, in recent form, has won 46.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fourlis has won 53.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.1% and 41.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cascino has saved 52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fourlis has saved 47.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cascino has won 35.29% of matches played (W/L 6/ 11), with Fourlis winning 48.65% (W/L 18/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cascino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 128/ 77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 19/ 34). Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76).
- Player level: In the last year, Cascino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 35.29% of matches (W/L 6/ 11), where as Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cascino winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cascino winning 0 and Fourlis winning 2. The last match between Cascino and Fourlis was at the W25 Klosters, 19-06-2019, First, Clay with Jaimee Fourlis getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cascino and Fourlis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cascino winning 0 times and Fourlis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cascino winning 0, and Fourlis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cascino has played against opponents with an average rank of 332.06 while Fourlis has played against players with an average rank of 216.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cascino has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fourlis has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cascino has converted 53.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fourlis has converted 52.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cascino 0 - 1 Fourlis
855
Rank
406
High
28
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
305
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
55% (266-217)
Career Total W/L
57% (204-154)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$275,258
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Estelle Cascino | Jaimee Fourlis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (53/86) | 74% (37/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (31/53) | 70% (26/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (11/33) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 26% (5/19) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (19/50) | 51% (44/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Estelle Cascino
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Estelle Cascino | Jaimee Fourlis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) | 42% (16/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (45/68) | 48% (171/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 41 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 21 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:10 | 1:58:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 201.67 | 224 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (235/403) | 64% (733/1141) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (140/235) | 57% (416/733) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (69/168) | 42% (170/408) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (14/26) | 54% (73/136) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (138/354) | 46% (553/1205) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Estelle Cascino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Estelle Cascino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Estelle Cascino
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Estelle Cascino
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Estelle Cascino
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Estelle Cascino
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Estelle Cascino
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-0 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Estelle Cascino
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Estelle Cascino
Player
Adrienn Nagy
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kathleen Kanev
Player
Estelle Cascino
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Estelle Cascino
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
47%
(
9 of
19)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
14 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
27
Total Points Won
20
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Despina Papamichail
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Panna Udvardy
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Yana Morderger
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
52 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Cascino Vs Fourlis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
