En Shuo Liang vs Katie Swan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Liang vs Swan analysis and find out who is favored!
En Shuo Liang vs Katie Swan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liang has won 50.64% of points on his second serve, while Swan has won 40.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liang, in recent form, has won 55.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Swan has won 58.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.9% and 40.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liang has saved 55.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Swan has saved 50.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liang has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 35/ 30), with Swan winning 51.61% (W/L 16/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liang has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 11/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25). Swan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 20/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Liang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/ 27), where as Swan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Liang winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Liang winning 0 and Swan winning 2. The last match between Liang and Swan was at the Liuzhou, 01-11-2018, Second, Hard with Katie Swan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Liang and Swan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Liang winning 0 times and Swan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Liang winning 0, and Swan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liang has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.69 while Swan has played against players with an average rank of 233.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liang has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Swan has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liang has converted 42.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Swan has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Liang 0 - 1 Swan
1
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
288
Rank
150
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
333
Rank
118
High
25
Age
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
52% (154-141)
Career Total W/L
60% (201-132)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
44% (4-5)
$230,644
Career Prize Money
$221,866
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | En Shuo Liang | Katie Swan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 6 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (30/55) | 54% (26/48) |
1st Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 73% (19/26) |
2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 41% (9/22) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 86% (6/7) |
Return Points W% | 42% (20/48) | 55% (30/55) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Katie Swan
Player
En Shuo Liang
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | En Shuo Liang | Katie Swan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 44% (4/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 49% (26/27) | 50% (10/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (255/249) | 50% (89/90) |
Hard Win/Loss | 18% (2/9) | 44% (4/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 66 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.46 |
DFs Total | 64 | 40 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:44 | 1:45:26 |
Avg Opp Rank | 273.23 | 176.22 |
1st Serve % | 56% (760/1367) | 61% (326/534) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (511/760) | 66% (215/326) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (305/607) | 39% (81/208) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (61/148) | 42% (36/85) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (581/1432) | 47% (293/630) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 40% (8/12) | 44% (4/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 44% (4/9) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 11% (1/9) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 67% (6/4) |
1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 33% (6/2) |
1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (3/0) |
En Shuo Liang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
En Shuo Liang
62%
(
68 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Arina Rodionova
Player
En Shuo Liang
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Sijia Wei
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
En Shuo Liang
Player
Yuki Naito
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
En Shuo Liang
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
En Shuo Liang
Player
Aneta Kladivova
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Katie Swan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Melisa Ercan
Player
Katie Swan
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
42%
(
18 of
43)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
14 of
18)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Aoi Ito
Player
Katie Swan
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katie Swan
Player
Melisa Ercan
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katie Swan
Player
Xiaodi You
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petra Hule
Player
Katie Swan
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
68%
(
64 of
94)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sara Saito
Player
Katie Swan
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katie Swan
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katie Swan
Player
Fernanda Contreras Gomez
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Katie Swan
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Amandine Monnot
Player
Katie Swan
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
43
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 4-3 ret. | H2H |
view more