Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emma Navarro vs Paula Badosa Gibert Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Navarro vs Gibert analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Emma Navarro vs Paula Badosa Gibert Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Navarro 0 - 1 Gibert
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Navarro has won 49.4% of points on their second serve, while Gibert has won 46.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Navarro, in recent form, has won 56.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gibert has won 56.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.51% and 33.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Navarro has saved 55.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibert has saved 65.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Navarro has won 70.33% of matches played (W/L 64/ 27), with Gibert winning 51.85% (W/L 14/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Navarro has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 59/ 43). Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Navarro has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.65% of matches (W/L 23/ 11), where as Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Navarro winning 0 times and Gibert being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Navarro winning 1 and Gibert winning 2. The last match between Navarro and Gibert was at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome, 09-05-2024, Second, Clay with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Navarro and Gibert have played a deciding set 1 times, with Navarro winning 0 times and Gibert 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Navarro winning 0, and Gibert 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Navarro has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.19 while Gibert has played against players with an average rank of 220.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Navarro has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibert has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Navarro has converted 47.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibert has converted 46.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
19
Rank
17
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
113
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
64% (186-104)
Career Total W/L
64% (349-197)
71% (36-15)
YTD W/L
52% (13-12)
$1,322,641
Career Prize Money
$5,095,525
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emma Navarro vs Paula Badosa Gibert For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Navarro VS Gibert
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Emma Navarro | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:54 | 1:56:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (53/88) | 65% (58/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (33/53) | 59% (34/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (17/35) | 61% (19/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (36/89) | 43% (38/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emma Navarro | Paula Badosa Gibert |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (36/15) | 52% (13/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (79/45) | 52% (32/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (630/484) | 51% (291/276) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (21/7) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 80 | 97 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 126 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:28 | 1:45:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 136.76 | 233.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (2405/3656) | 59% (1145/1933) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1534/2405) | 66% (759/1145) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (618/1251) | 47% (370/788) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (233/492) | 46% (93/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1745/3747) | 42% (778/1832) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (9/6) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (15/6) | 44% (4/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (35/50) | 59% (13/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (14/21) | 62% (8/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (30/28) | 60% (10/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (30/2) | 40% (10/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (21/8) | 47% (15/7) |
Emma Navarro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
81 of
124)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
53 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Caroline Wozniacki
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Peyton Stearns
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katerina Siniakova
Player
Emma Navarro
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Emma Navarro
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Madison Keys
77%
(
74 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
84)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Sara Errani
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
48 of
63)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Emma Navarro
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jule Niemeier
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Arantxa Rus
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Navarro Vs Gibert Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Navarro are available here and Gibert photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Emma Navarro
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
