Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Appleton vs Michika Ozeki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Appleton vs Ozeki analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Appleton vs Michika Ozeki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Appleton has won 47.26% of points on his second serve, while Ozeki has won 41.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Appleton, in recent form, has won 52.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ozeki has won 56.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.63% and 39.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Appleton has saved 53.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ozeki has saved 49.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Appleton has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 35/ 30), with Ozeki winning 42% (W/L 21/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Appleton has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 43/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Ozeki has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 20/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 18/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Appleton has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 33/ 27), where as Ozeki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.63% of matches (W/L 13/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Appleton winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Appleton winning 0 and Ozeki winning 2. The last match between Appleton and Ozeki was at the Makinohara, 10-10-2018, First, Carpet with Michika Ozeki getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Appleton and Ozeki have played a deciding set 0 times, with Appleton winning 0 times and Ozeki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Appleton winning 0, and Ozeki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Appleton has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.72 while Ozeki has played against players with an average rank of 178.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Appleton has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ozeki has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Appleton has converted 39.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ozeki has converted 49.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Appleton 0 - 1 Ozeki
394
Rank
368
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
804
Rank
433
High
32
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
50% (181-178)
Career Total W/L
48% (259-279)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$2,804
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emily Appleton | Michika Ozeki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (31/56) | 73% (46/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (17/31) | 57% (26/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 28% (7/25) | 59% (10/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (27/63) | 57% (32/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Michika Ozeki
Player
Emily Appleton
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Appleton | Michika Ozeki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (37/31) | 47% (22/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (321/308) | 48% (206/223) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 197 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.61 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 189 | 70 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:44 | 1:29:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.77 | 190.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1140/1992) | 63% (844/1350) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (806/1140) | 56% (476/844) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (401/852) | 41% (208/506) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (92/237) | 49% (83/170) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (887/2132) | 47% (608/1289) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (18/13) | 62% (8/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 83% (5/6) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 25% (12/3) |
Emily Appleton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
35 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Katherine Sebov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
7
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Kyle S. Mcphillips
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Emily Appleton
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Emily Appleton
82%
(
60 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Noelia Manta
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Ivana Corley
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michika Ozeki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mio Mushika
Player
Michika Ozeki
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gyeong Seo Lee
Player
Michika Ozeki
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hina Inoue
Player
Michika Ozeki
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Yanan Hou
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
99)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Michika Ozeki
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Michika Ozeki
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Maaya Rajeshwaran Revathi
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
65)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Anjali Rathi
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(4) 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anjali Rathi
Player
Michika Ozeki
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Apurva Vemuri
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Appleton Vs Ozeki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
