Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Gomez vs Quentin Halys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gomez vs Halys analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Gomez vs Quentin Halys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomez has won 50.49% of points on his second serve, while Halys has won 49.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomez, in recent form, has won 56.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Halys has won 46.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.91% and 27.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gomez has saved 67.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Halys has saved 61.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gomez has won 31.03% of matches played (W/L 9/ 20), with Halys winning 43.59% (W/L 17/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 216/ 134), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Halys has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 128/ 93), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 97/ 89).
- Player level: In the last year, Gomez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 7/ 14), where as Halys has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 12/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gomez winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gomez winning 1 and Halys winning 4. The last match between Gomez and Halys was at the Porto Challenger, 03-07-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Quentin Halys getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gomez and Halys have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gomez winning 0 times and Halys 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gomez winning 0, and Halys 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 297.41 while Halys has played against players with an average rank of 220.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomez has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Halys has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomez has converted 51.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Halys has converted 34.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gomez 0 - 2 Halys
614
Rank
90
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
170
Rank
61
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (425-324)
Career Total W/L
55% (369-297)
44% (4-5)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$571,180
Career Prize Money
$1,246,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emilio Gomez | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 19 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 16 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:39 | 1:38:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (73/143) | 54% (83/154) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (49/73) | 80% (66/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (30/70) | 42% (30/71) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 69% (9/13) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (58/154) | 45% (64/143) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Gomez
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
10
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Gomez
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Gomez | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (4/5) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 43% (22/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (89/77) | 49% (251/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.81 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 206 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:19 | 1:44:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 194 | 238.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (294/500) | 56% (897/1589) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (189/294) | 78% (697/897) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (104/206) | 50% (344/692) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (29/56) | 35% (43/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (203/453) | 35% (569/1629) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (4/4) | 54% (7/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (4/8) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Emilio Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Emilio Gomez
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Enzo Camargo Lima
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Emilio Gomez
42%
(
28 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Roveri Sidney
Player
Emilio Gomez
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
14 of
27)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36
Total Points Won
32
|
6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Joaquim Almeida
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Emilio Gomez
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Joaquim Almeida
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Emilio Gomez
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Quentin Halys
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Quentin Halys
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Quentin Halys
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
1
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
4
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Quentin Halys
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Jeff Wolf
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
26
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Quentin Halys
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gomez Vs Halys Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
