Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emiliana Arango vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Arango vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Emiliana Arango vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Arango has won 36.93% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 48.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Arango, in recent form, has won 54.09% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 54.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.63% and 41.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Arango has saved 51.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 57.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Arango has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Inglis winning 61.67% (W/L 37/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Arango has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 31/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Arango has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12), where as Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.15% of matches (W/L 34/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Arango winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Arango winning 0 and Inglis winning 2. The last match between Arango and Inglis was at the W100 Surbiton, 05-06-2023, Q3, Grass with Maddison Inglis getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Arango and Inglis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Arango winning 0 times and Inglis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Arango winning 0, and Inglis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Arango has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.77 while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 309.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Arango has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Arango has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 48.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Arango 0 - 1 Inglis
121
Rank
109
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
305
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
59% (201-140)
Career Total W/L
59% (248-172)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
71% (17-7)
$170,639
Career Prize Money
$423,460
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emiliana Arango | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (34/56) | 62% (40/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (22/34) | 65% (26/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 27% (6/22) | 56% (14/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 33% (4/12) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (25/65) | 50% (28/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emiliana Arango
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emiliana Arango | Maddison Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 71% (17/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (19/31) | 67% (38/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (200/250) | 57% (299/228) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 63% (10/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 86 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 88 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:31 | 1:48:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.91 | 317.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1079/1542) | 61% (977/1610) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (613/1079) | 67% (659/977) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 37% (171/463) | 48% (306/633) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (86/200) | 47% (102/216) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (699/1530) | 46% (802/1737) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 75% (15/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (8/21) | 71% (17/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 33% (9/3) |
Emiliana Arango Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Emiliana Arango
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Astra Sharma
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Emiliana Arango
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
77%
(
84 of
109)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
0-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Amanda Anisimova
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Greetje Minnen
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
73 of
97)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Riera
Player
Emiliana Arango
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Emiliana Arango
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Tatjana Maria
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Alexandra Eala
76%
(
64 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
42 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Stacey Fung
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Ena Shibahara
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kimberly Birrell
50%
(
39 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arina Rodionova
55%
(
54 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Kyoka Okamura
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Arango Vs Inglis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
