Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Olivia Tjandramulia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mandlik vs Tjandramulia analysis and find out who is favored!
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Olivia Tjandramulia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mandlik 2 - 0 Tjandramulia
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mandlik has won 43.86% of points on his second serve, while Tjandramulia has won 39.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mandlik, in recent form, has won 53.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tjandramulia has won 47.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.26% and 35.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mandlik has saved 44.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tjandramulia has saved 48.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mandlik has won 51.79% of matches played (W/L 29/ 27), with Tjandramulia winning 16.67% (W/L 2/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Tjandramulia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 116/ 126), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 12/ 11), where as Tjandramulia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 18.18% of matches (W/L 2/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mandlik winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mandlik winning 4 and Tjandramulia winning 0. The last match between Mandlik and Tjandramulia was at the Ningbo Open - Ningbo, 23-09-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:23:15.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mandlik and Tjandramulia have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mandlik winning 0 times and Tjandramulia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mandlik winning 0, and Tjandramulia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mandlik has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.41 while Tjandramulia has played against players with an average rank of 232.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mandlik has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tjandramulia has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mandlik has converted 51.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tjandramulia has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
138
Rank
97
High
23
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
350
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
56% (146-113)
Career Total W/L
46% (175-206)
25% (3-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$308,720
Career Prize Money
$4,725
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mandlik VS Tjandramulia H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Olivia Tjandramulia |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:23:15 | 0:23:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (19/36) | 79% (30/38) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (16/19) | 20% (6/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (6/17) | 38% (3/8) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 76% (29/38) | 39% (14/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Mandlik VS Tjandramulia H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Olivia Tjandramulia |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (3/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) | 25% (2/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (125/146) | 41% (32/47) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:31 | 1:18:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 180 | 230 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (495/862) | 63% (117/186) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (293/495) | 53% (62/117) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (152/367) | 39% (27/69) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (53/98) | 35% (6/17) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (387/858) | 40% (81/204) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (3/12) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Claire Liu
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jessika Ponchet
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Olivia Tjandramulia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Adelina Lachinova
89%
(
70 of
79)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mandlik Vs Tjandramulia Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
