Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Erika Andreeva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mandlik vs Andreeva analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Erika Andreeva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mandlik 0 - 0 Andreeva
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mandlik has won 44.9% of points on their second serve, while Andreeva has won 46.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mandlik, in recent form, has won 53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Andreeva has won 52.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.6% and 39.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mandlik has saved 47.06% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Andreeva has saved 52.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mandlik has won 48.08% of matches played (W/L 25/ 27), with Andreeva winning 64.1% (W/L 50/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 85/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6). Andreeva has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 39/ 18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 43/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 12/ 12), where as Andreeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mandlik has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.33 while Andreeva has played against players with an average rank of 215.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mandlik has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Andreeva has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mandlik has converted 49.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Andreeva has converted 48.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
171
Rank
97
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
101
Rank
94
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
56% (149-117)
Career Total W/L
66% (169-88)
32% (6-13)
YTD W/L
60% (26-17)
$311,232
Career Prize Money
$399,752
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Elizabeth Mandlik vs Erika Andreeva For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Mandlik VS Andreeva
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elizabeth Mandlik | Erika Andreeva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 32% (6/13) | 60% (26/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (19/28) | 57% (56/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (214/232) | 52% (469/437) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 67% (4/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 128 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:23 | 1:45:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 167.47 | 245.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (842/1428) | 63% (1870/2951) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (514/842) | 63% (1185/1870) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (258/586) | 47% (505/1081) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (81/165) | 47% (162/348) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (650/1476) | 44% (1280/2888) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 70% (7/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 32% (6/19) | 61% (25/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 54% (7/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 22% (2/9) | 69% (9/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (20/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (20/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 26% (23/6) |
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Despina Papamichail
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
79 of
128)
1st Serve %
45%
(
42 of
93)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
56 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(10) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
80%
(
89 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
76 of
99)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Amanda Anisimova
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Daria Snigur
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Erika Andreeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Emina Bektas
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
48 of
70)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sonay Kartal
Player
Erika Andreeva
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Despina Papamichail
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Polina Kudermetova
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Erika Andreeva
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Camilla Rosatello
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Erika Andreeva
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Erika Andreeva
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Chloe Paquet
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mandlik Vs Andreeva Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Mandlik are available here and Andreeva photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Erika Andreeva
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
