Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eliessa Vanlangendonck vs Claudia HOSTE Ferrer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vanlangendonck vs Ferrer analysis and find out who is favored!
Eliessa Vanlangendonck vs Claudia HOSTE Ferrer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vanlangendonck has won 46.37% of points on his second serve, while Ferrer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vanlangendonck, in recent form, has won 59.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ferrer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vanlangendonck has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferrer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vanlangendonck has won 63.83% of matches played (W/L 30/ 17), with Ferrer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vanlangendonck has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 144/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13). Ferrer has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Vanlangendonck has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12), where as Ferrer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vanlangendonck has played against opponents with an average rank of 174.06 while Ferrer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vanlangendonck has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferrer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vanlangendonck has converted 54.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferrer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vanlangendonck 0 - 0 Ferrer
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vanlangendonck VS Ferrer H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eliessa Vanlangendonck | Claudia HOSTE Ferrer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (34/21) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (284/235) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 17 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 75 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151.65 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1057/1639) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (622/1057) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (271/582) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (128/224) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (846/1694) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 65% (15/8) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 1st Match |
Eliessa Vanlangendonck Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Patricija Paukstyte
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Dayeon Back
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
95 of
131)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
52 of
95)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
64 of
131)
122
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Sara Daavettila
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
52 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Emily Welker
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Radovanovic
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Greta Greco Lucchina
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Marie Villet
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Jessica Failla
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Olivia Carneiro
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Claudia HOSTE Ferrer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Zi Ying Ruan
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Erika Bosaia
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gloriana Nahum
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
75%
(
98 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
12
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
25%
(
8 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
65 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
125)
126
Total Points Won
129
|
7-6(7) 6-7(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Caroline Brack
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
9
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
46 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rinko Matsuda
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
37%
(
19 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
63%
(
86 of
137)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
5
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
61 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
123
Total Points Won
122
|
5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denislava Glushkova
Player
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
46%
(
43 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
0
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
2
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
52 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(6) 1-6 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Vanlangendonck Vs Ferrer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
