Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elena Milovanovic vs Tina Nadine Smith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milovanovic vs Smith analysis and find out who is favored!
Elena Milovanovic vs Tina Nadine Smith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Milovanovic 1 - 0 Smith
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milovanovic has won 43.31% of points on his second serve, while Smith has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milovanovic, in recent form, has won 56.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Smith has won 51.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.26% and 40.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milovanovic has saved 58.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Smith has saved 56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milovanovic has won 59.32% of matches played (W/L 35/ 24), with Smith winning 57.32% (W/L 47/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milovanovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 15/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 54/ 53). Smith has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 7/ 4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 38/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Milovanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18), where as Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.02% of matches (W/L 47/ 34). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milovanovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milovanovic winning 2 and Smith winning 0. The last match between Milovanovic and Smith was at the W15 Cairo, 02-05-2019, Second, Clay with Elena Milovanovic getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milovanovic and Smith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milovanovic winning 0 times and Smith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milovanovic winning 0, and Smith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milovanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.69 while Smith has played against players with an average rank of 291.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milovanovic has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Smith has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milovanovic has converted 48.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Smith has converted 43.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Milovanovic 1 - 0 Smith
529
Rank
487
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
343
Rank
328
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (132-110)
Career Total W/L
56% (139-111)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
58% (22-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Milovanovic VS Smith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Elena Milovanovic | Tina Nadine Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:0 | 1:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (31/40) | 62% (31/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (24/31) | 45% (14/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (5/9) | 37% (7/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (29/50) | 28% (11/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Milovanovic VS Smith H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elena Milovanovic | Tina Nadine Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 58% (22/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (26/24) | 57% (52/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (224/213) | 53% (448/391) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 56% (10/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 80 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 128 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:57 | 1:45:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.5 | 267.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (870/1411) | 60% (1497/2510) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (561/870) | 66% (986/1497) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (228/541) | 50% (511/1013) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (80/166) | 43% (137/318) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (618/1369) | 44% (1140/2566) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 59% (22/15) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 58% (22/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 47% (7/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 76% (25/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 24% (25/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 23% (13/3) |
Elena Milovanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ines Ibbou
Player
Elena Milovanovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Elena Milovanovic
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Arabella Koller
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
79%
(
64 of
81)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Tess Sugnaux
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Maelle Leclercq
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luana Plaza Araujo
Player
Elena Milovanovic
61%
(
60 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Elena Milovanovic
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Tina Nadine Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Pia Lovric
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Weronika Falkowska
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
112)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
3
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
11
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Emeline Dartron
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Milovanovic Vs Smith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
