Egor Gerasimov vs Patrik Fabian Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L W W L W L
Form
W W L L W W W L W LHead-To-Head: Gerasimov 1 - 0 Fabian
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gerasimov winning 2 and Fabian winning 0. The last match between Gerasimov and Fabian was at the Bratislava Challenger, 07-11-2016, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Egor Gerasimov getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Egor Gerasimov | 1 |
| Patrik Fabian | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bratislava Challenger(07-11-2016)
Egor Gerasimov
Patrik Fabian
6
3
6
3
| Gerasimov | Stats | Fabian |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 530 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 65 | Highest Rank | 548 |
| 32 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 57% (434-334) | Career Total W/L | 55% (140-114) |
| $1,093,630 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Safiullin PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Darderi VS Giron PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Patrik Fabian
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:54:29 | Average Match Time | 0:54:29 |
| 80% (36/45) | 1st Serve % | 70% (37/53) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 78% (7/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (25/53) | Return Points Win % | 27% (12/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Egor Gerasimov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Shunsuke Mitsui
Player
Egor Gerasimov
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Minghui Zhang
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shunsuke Mitsui
Player
Egor Gerasimov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Linang Xiao
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
105)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Egor Gerasimov
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Egor Gerasimov
34%
(
13 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Axel Garcian
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrik Fabian Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Lazov
Player
Patrik Fabian
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
10 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
39
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Matvey Khomentovskiy
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Patrik Fabian
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
5
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Claudio Fortuna
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Conor Berg
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Fabian
Player
Marsel Ilhan
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Patrik Fabian
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
12
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Patrik Fabian
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (434/334) | Win/Loss | 55% (140/114) |
| 55% (1010/828) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (313/250) |
| 52% (9229/8575) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2792/2483) |
| 59% (193/135) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (55/33) |
| 46% (59/70) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (61/61) |
| 60% (179/118) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (23/19) |
| 21% (3/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 4116 | Aces Total | 381 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 1820 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
| 1:14:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 521.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 567.17 |
| 64% (28240/44322) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3462/5500) |
| 73% (20489/28240) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2461/3462) |
| 49% (7861/16074) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1012/2038) |
| 40% (1513/3752) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (237/576) |
| 37% (16382/43919) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2262/5757) |
| 31% (12/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (4/15) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 72% (18/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (88/73) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (198/142) | Challenger W/L | 35% (9/17) |
| 62% (113/69) | Futures W/L | 57% (131/97) |
| 56% (414/733) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (139/252) |
| 57% (16/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (160/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (36/78) |
| 54% (144/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (23/57) |
| 86% (412/353) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (151/130) |
| 14% (412/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (151/21) |
| 23% (355/82) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (103/10) |
Gerasimov vs. Fabian Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
