Dominik Meffert vs Alessio Di Mauro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Meffert vs Mauro analysis and find out who is favored!
Dominik Meffert vs Alessio Di Mauro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meffert 0 - 0 Mauro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meffert has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mauro has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meffert, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mauro has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meffert has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mauro has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meffert has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Mauro winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meffert has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 74/ 50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12). Mauro has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meffert has played against opponents with an average rank of while Mauro has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meffert has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mauro has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meffert has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mauro has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
46
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Dominik Meffert vs Alessio Di Mauro For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Meffert VS Mauro
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dominik Meffert | Alessio Di Mauro |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Dominik Meffert Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Elie Rousset
Player
Dominik Meffert
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Nils Langer
Player
Dominik Meffert
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dominik Meffert
Player
Patrick Prader
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
118)
12
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
56 of
71)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
39 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(5) 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Dominik Meffert
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dominik Meffert
Player
Moritz Dettinger
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Dominik Meffert
Player
Matteo Donati
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Janez Semrajc
Player
Dominik Meffert
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dominik Meffert
Player
Gianluca Mager
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Dominik Meffert
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Dominik Meffert
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Alessio Di Mauro Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Franko Skugor
Player
Alessio di Mauro
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Artem Smirnov
Player
Alessio di Mauro
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alessio di Mauro
Player
Giovanni Rizzuti
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF | 5-7 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
F | 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
QF |
Victor Estrella
Player
Alessio di Mauro
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alessio di Mauro
Player
Luis David Martinez
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Meffert Vs Mauro Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Meffert are available here and Mauro photos here.