David Guez vs Roberto Cid Subervi Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L L W W L
Form
W W W W L W L W L LH2H: Guez 1 - 0 Subervi
They have played 3 sets in total, with Guez winning 2 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Guez and Subervi was at the Recanati Challenger, 02-07-2018, First, Hard with David Guez getting the victory 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| David Guez | 1 |
| Roberto Cid Subervi | 0 |
Recanati Challenger(02-07-2018)
4
6
7
6
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
22 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 |
Stats 
David Guez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
17
Games Won
14
4
Aces (Total)
5
5
Total Double Faults
8
2:22:20
Average Match Time
2:22:20
53% (50/94)
1st Serve %
52% (51/99)
70% (35/50)
1st Serve Win %
71% (36/51)
57% (25/44)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (20/48)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (4/8)
43% (43/99)
Return Points Win %
36% (34/94)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Guez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
David Guez
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Erik Crepaldi
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
8
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Edgar Jeanmougin
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
David Guez
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
37%
(
28 of
75)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
David Guez
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
David Guez
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
David Guez
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
7
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
David Guez
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurynas Grigelis
Player
David Guez
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Blu Baker
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
33%
(
13 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ryan Cozad
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Adhithya Ganesan
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aditya Govila
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jackson Ross
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (641/414)
Win/Loss
58% (304/221)
58% (1409/1012)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (686/541)
53% (11855/10374)
Games Win/Loss
53% (5965/5319)
66% (184/93)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (132/87)
56% (198/153)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (158/114)
61% (257/162)
Indoor Hard W/L
42% (14/19)
25% (2/6)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.08
Aces Per Game
0.15
832
Aces Total
815
0.09
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
1021
Total Double Faults
1395
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:26:37
608.92
Average Opponent Rank
498.92
59% (19179/32680)
1st Serve %
61% (17585/28674)
65% (12450/19179)
1st Serve Win %
66% (11566/17585)
50% (6688/13503)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (5336/11089)
46% (1659/3629)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (1584/3397)
43% (13710/32035)
Return Points Win %
44% (12745/29071)
45% (25/31)
Slam W/L
0% (0/7)
31% (4/9)
Masters W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
27% (4/11)
50% (31/31)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (225/235)
Challenger W/L
42% (80/110)
77% (356/108)
Futures W/L
71% (220/91)
61% (630/1039)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (296/510)
56% (5/9)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
38% (3/8)
49% (118/241)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
45% (61/135)
57% (176/307)
Deciding Set Win %
55% (96/175)
89% (614/546)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (286/242)
11% (614/68)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (286/43)
22% (441/95)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
26% (239/61)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
