Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Glinka vs Patrick Brady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glinka vs Brady analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Glinka vs Patrick Brady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Brady
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glinka has won 52.42% of points on their second serve, while Brady has won 44.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glinka, in recent form, has won 52.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brady has won 50.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.19% and 36.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glinka has saved 70.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brady has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glinka has won 60.76% of matches played (W/L 48/ 31), with Brady winning 52.5% (W/L 21/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29). Brady has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 24/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 9/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 38/ 22), where as Brady has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glinka winning 1 times and Brady being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Glinka winning 2 and Brady winning 1. The last match between Glinka and Brady was at the Ortisei Challenger, 23-10-2023, Q3, I.hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory 4-6 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Glinka and Brady have played a deciding set 1 times, with Glinka winning 1 times and Brady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glinka winning 0, and Brady 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glinka has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.58 while Brady has played against players with an average rank of 356.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glinka has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brady has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glinka has converted 36.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brady has converted 40.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
426
Rank
419
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
777
Rank
728
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
52% (163-149)
Career Total W/L
52% (41-38)
55% (23-19)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniil Glinka vs Patrick Brady For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Glinka VS Brady
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Patrick Brady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Patrick Brady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (23/19) | 57% (8/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (56/41) | 53% (16/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (509/433) | 49% (134/140) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.53 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 242 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 92 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:39 | 1:47:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 173.76 | 251.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1830/2906) | 72% (655/916) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1353/1830) | 63% (412/655) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (564/1076) | 44% (115/261) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (111/307) | 41% (39/96) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1190/3092) | 42% (358/860) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (18/12) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (23/42) | 54% (7/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 23% (3/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 72% (29/21) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 28% (29/8) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 14% (7/1) |
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Tiago Pereira
Player
Daniil Glinka
46%
(
31 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ricardo Batista
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Daniil Glinka
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
95)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniil Glinka
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yanki Erel
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
13
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Daniil Glinka
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
32%
(
13 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Robin Bertrand
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Orel Kimhi
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Brady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Patrick Brady
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
78 of
105)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Patrick Brady
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Lohithaksha Bathrinath
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Patrick Brady
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Lucas Gerch
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Collin Altamirano
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Jaimee Floyd Angele
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
2
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bor Artnak
Player
Patrick Brady
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Patrick Brady
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
18 of
34)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
15 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33
Total Points Won
35
|
4-6 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Glinka Vs Brady Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Glinka are available here and Brady photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
