Daniela Vismane vs Joanna Garland Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vismane vs Garland analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniela Vismane vs Joanna Garland Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vismane has won 45.66% of points on his second serve, while Garland has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vismane, in recent form, has won 56.76% of his opponent's second serve points, while Garland has won 53.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.05% and 34.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vismane has saved 50.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garland has saved 58.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vismane has won 52.63% of matches played (W/L 30/ 27), with Garland winning 62.75% (W/L 32/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vismane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 27/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Garland has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 126/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Vismane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.94% of matches (W/L 23/ 24), where as Garland has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.91% of matches (W/L 29/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vismane winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vismane winning 0 and Garland winning 2. The last match between Vismane and Garland was at the W60 Amstelveen, 06-07-2021, Q3, Clay with Joanna Garland getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vismane and Garland have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vismane winning 0 times and Garland 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Vismane winning 0, and Garland 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vismane has played against opponents with an average rank of 293.21 while Garland has played against players with an average rank of 209.39.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vismane has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garland has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vismane has converted 47.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garland has converted 50.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vismane 0 - 1 Garland
4
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
408
Rank
228
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
302
Rank
221
High
22
Age
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
61% (230-144)
Career Total W/L
65% (188-101)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
50% (2-2)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$2,400
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniela Vismane | Joanna Garland |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 10 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:14:0 | 2:14:0 |
1st Serve % | 71% (59/83) | 65% (51/79) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (35/59) | 55% (28/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 29% (7/24) | 64% (18/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 36% (4/11) |
Return Points W% | 42% (33/79) | 49% (41/83) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(8) 6-4 |
Joanna Garland
Player
Daniela Vismane
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniela Vismane | Joanna Garland |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 50% (2/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (25/29) | 50% (4/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (244/257) | 57% (45/34) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 5 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 38 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:50:42 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 223.5 | 25.5 |
1st Serve % | 73% (1140/1568) | 51% (33/65) |
1st Serve W% | 54% (617/1140) | 73% (24/33) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (195/428) | 47% (15/32) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (109/232) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Pts W% | 48% (807/1683) | 24% (14/58) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (11/22) | 50% (2/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Daniela Vismane Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Hannah Klugman
Player
Daniela Vismane
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
-
Aces
-
14
Double Faults
0
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Daniela Vismane
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
81%
(
62 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Simona Waltert
Player
Daniela Vismane
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
85%
(
33 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniela Vismane
Player
Lea Boskovic
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Iva Primorac
Player
Daniela Vismane
35%
(
19 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniela Vismane
Player
Maria Toma
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Joanna Garland Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Joanna Garland
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
SF |
Darya Astakhova
Player
Joanna Garland
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Joanna Garland
Player
Priscilla Hon
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joanna Garland
Player
Mio Mushika
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joanna Garland
Player
Olivia Gadecki
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ena Koike
Player
Joanna Garland
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more